VSEA’s second ULP challenges a recently resigned Judiciary employee’s assigned “temporary” status, contending the classification “interfered, restrained and coerced the VSEA and [employee] in the rights protected by 3 V.S.A. ξ1026(1) and (5)," and that the Judiciary "refused to bargain with the Union concerning the employee’s terms and conditions of employment, all in violation of 3 V.S.A. ξ1026(1) and (5)."
Stay Up To Date!
Sign Up For Our Weekly Newsletter!
Follow Our Facebook And Twitter!
|