1. An employee in who refuses to sign the form to attest that they are fully vaccinated and refuses to comply with regular COVID-19 testing or wear an appropriate face covering:
a. Will be placed in an authorized off payroll status (AOFF) for a period not to exceed five (5) workdays to reconsider complying with the program’s requirements. Authorized off payroll is unpaid leave.
b. Any employee who fails to comply within the five (5) workday period, will be placed on an Unpaid Administrative Leave of Absence until such time as they decide to comply, or the mitigation measures are lifted. An Unpaid Administrative Leave of Absence is unpaid leave and benefits (example: an employee would need to pay 100% of health insurance premiums).
2. Falsification of an Attestation form will be considered gross misconduct and addressed through the normal disciplinary processes.
VSEA is thanking Barre Community Correctional Officer and VSEA Member, Fred Fleury, for a great summer of racing at Thunder Road and for using your car to send two important messages to Vermonters who attended a race this season at Thunder Road: “A Pension is a Promise” and “Protect Our Pensions!”
VSEA members met virtually on Saturday to conduct the union’s business for the upcoming fiscal year, which primarily means adopting an operating budget and passing or defeating bylaw change proposals. One highlight of this year’s meeting was the announcement of officer election winners by the VSEA Elections, Rules and Nominating Committee. The winners are:
President – Aimee Towne (ESD)
First Vice President – Margaret Crowley (Judiciary)
In testimony this week to the Pension Task Force, charged with drafting a proposal(s) to ensure funding for the state employee, teacher, and trooper pension plans, Public Assets Institute President Paul Cillo offered a proposal to address the issue that doesn’t involve cuts to existing pensions.
From Cillo’s Remarks:
It is true that most Vermonters pay enough in taxes. But that’s not true for all Vermonters. Many Vermonters at the top, with much greater amounts of discretionary income, still pay less as a percentage of their income in state and local taxes than their lower-income neighbors, according to a 50-state analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.
Additionally, the 2017 federal tax cuts left $500 million in formerly collected federal taxes in the hands of Vermonters—most of it in the hands of the top 20 percent of taxpayers. This is money previously paid in taxes that is no longer being collected—$500 million each year.
So the suggestion that all Vermonters are overtaxed is not true. A revenue strategy targeted to those at the top could raise additional needed revenue without hurting those who already pay enough. Specifically, a one percent surcharge on the income of the top one percent of Vermont taxpayers would raise about $33 million, three percent would raise $100 million. As you’ve heard from Graham Campbell, eliminating Vermont’s capital gains exclusion would raise another $15-20 million per year.
